• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 41 mins GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 2 days Hydrogen balloon still deflating
  • 3 days Renewables are expensive
  • 8 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 11 days More bad news for renewables and hydrogen
  • 11 hours EVs way more expensive to drive
  • 2 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 5 days EV future has been postponed
  • 7 days The (Necessarily Incomplete, Inarguably Ridiculous) List of Things "Caused by Climate Change" - By James Corbett of The CorbettReport.com
  • 40 days Green Energy's dirty secrets

Breaking News:

Fire at Greek Refinery: Crude Unit Down

Time To Stop Looking to China for Oil Demand Growth

Time To Stop Looking to China for Oil Demand Growth

Despite rebounding Chinese crude imports,…

Washington Reacts To Russia's Kursk Counteroffensive

Washington Reacts To Russia's Kursk Counteroffensive

The wider development is that…

Most U.S. States See Nuclear Power As Part Of Green Transition

The majority of U.S. states and the District of Columbia see a future for nuclear power in their respective energy policies for a transition away from fossil fuels, a survey by the Associated Press showed.

Two-thirds of all states and the District of Columbia say that in one form or another, nuclear power generation will be needed in the United States to meet the goals of a carbon-free grid by 2035 and net-zero emissions by 2050, the survey found.

However, the other one-third of U.S. states say their green energy plans do not include relying on nuclear power.

The U.S. Administration wants to reach the zero-carbon electricity goal and "that means nuclear, that means hydropower, that means geothermal, that means obviously wind on and offshore, that means solar," Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm told the Associated Press.

The Administration has included nuclear power in provisions for planned production tax credits in the Bill Back Better bill, which is stalled in the Senate.

"The hardworking men and women at our nation's nuclear power plants are on the front lines in the fight against the climate crisis, keeping the lights on without any carbon or air pollution and supporting our economy with 24/7 electricity," Secretary Granholm said in December after touring Exelon's Braidwood Generating Station in Will County in Illinois.

"The Build Back Better bill will help keep our existing nuclear fleet running while we invest in new nuclear technology," Granholm added.

West Virginia Democratic Senator Joe Manchin is seeking tax credits for nuclear power plants for 10 years instead of the six years as put in President Joe Biden's Build Back Better bill, which Manchin himself stalled late last year with his opposition to many of its provisions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Senator Manchin supports at least one climate policy in the bill—tax credits to nuclear power plants as part of the U.S. Administration's ambition to make the American power grid carbon-free by 2035. However, Manchin wants the tax credit for nuclear plants to last for 10 years, four years longer than in the draft, Bloomberg reported last week, citing three sources with knowledge of the matter.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • John St Antoine on January 18 2022 said:
    The new Nuclear Power Plant designs are a go ahead, old designs should be maintained, and short time now unless in great updated working condition, retire,
    It is just basic common sense,

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News