• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 2 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 3 days Hydrogen balloon still deflating
  • 3 days Renewables are expensive
  • 8 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 11 days More bad news for renewables and hydrogen
  • 12 hours EVs way more expensive to drive
  • 2 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 5 days EV future has been postponed
  • 7 days The (Necessarily Incomplete, Inarguably Ridiculous) List of Things "Caused by Climate Change" - By James Corbett of The CorbettReport.com
  • 40 days Green Energy's dirty secrets

Breaking News:

Fire at Greek Refinery: Crude Unit Down

Arkansas Lithium Deposits Spark Investment Surge

Arkansas Lithium Deposits Spark Investment Surge

Arkansas' Smackover Formation is emerging…

DoE Drops LNG Final Destination Reporting Requirement

The Department of Energy has removed a requirement that says U.S. LNG exporters need to report what the final destination of the cargo is in a bid to facilitate greater LNG exports. The change was praised by the LNG sector as it would indeed serve to make life easier for exporters.

S&P Global Platts notes that it would enhance exporters’ chances of securing more buyers for the commodity as they would not have to worry about risking their export authorization in case it is impossible to find out where the cargo would eventually end up.

The scrapping of the reporting rule, according to Energy Secretary Rick Perry, would "better provide reliable US LNG to our friends and allies abroad."

From now on, the Department of Energy would only require exporters to report the initial destination of their cargoes, Argus Media reports, noting the change created some confusion in the industry.

Originally, the requirement was put in place to prevent future LNG facilities in Canada and Mexico to gain an unfair advantage over U.S. LNG. Yet the Department of Energy said the concern was too minor to matter right now, and that the outlook for the future was positive.

Argus Media explains that the hypothetical advantage of Mexico and Canada is related to a requirement for the DoE to approve LNG and pipeline gas exports to countries that have a free-trade agreement with Washington. Canada and Mexico are such countries, but the same is not true for most of the biggest LNG importers.

That compromises LNG exporters’ chances of long-term buyer commitments since there is concern the Department of Energy, which has the right to rescind or modify LNG export licenses, would use this right in case domestic natural gas prices increase and more gas needs to stay in the United States

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News