With OPEC’s 2016 World Oil Outlook now grimly forecasting that peak oil demand could become a reality in just over a decade, and natural gas and renewables chomping at the bit to cannibalize commodity market growth, it may be good for the environment, but the trade-off will be global instability on a catastrophic level.
The dynamics of the rush to adopt natural gas and renewable energies - launched by the landmark climate change agreement signed in Paris last year – was about protecting our planet. But without an effective back-up plan, resource-cursed nations such as Venezuela, Libya, Nigeria and Iraq—among others—will not survive this evolution and economic destabilization and sociopolitical instability would irrevocably change the geopolitical landscape. Destitution spells disaster in this scenario.
Weaning off ‘Black Gold’? Not in our Lifetime, and not Without Repercussions
Hundreds of trillions of dollars have been spent worldwide over the past century to develop technologies for the safe transport and use of “black gold,” which, in turn has built energy-driven economies on practically every single continent, aside from Antarctica.
Venezuela, Libya, Nigeria and Iraq are the first nations that come to mind when compiling a list of oil-dependent states, mostly because of their current plights caused by the two-year oil price crisis, as well as the political instability, civil war, domestic militancy and terrorism threats that each country faces, respectively.
Chronically low prices compromise the ability of oil-addicted economies to tackle domestic unrest, which was brought about by stinted revenues in the first place.
If OPEC’s predictions on the imminent-ness of peak oil prove to be true, underdeveloped producers that have not yet planned for a fossil fuel-free world will inevitably face sociopolitical collapse. As oil demand spirals downward, the world’s major exporters are expected to ramp up output in order to profit as much as possible before the commodity becomes a relic of the past. Related: Oil Majors See Reserves Evaporate: Write Downs Continue
And, as we know from the state of current markets, the bigger the glut, the sadder the prices.
The four countries mentioned earlier, along with Algeria, represent the nations most vulnerable to the global abandonment of oil. But even Mexico, which has invited public and private actors to set up a sophisticated governmental hedge against depressed prices for the next year, will see its economy falter when there’s no market left to hedge.
Sovereign Wealth Fund or Bust
The Gulf nations have amassed a vast amount of fuel wealth over the past few decades. Wielding their financial-savvy as an economic shield, the countries have stored the revenues in sovereign wealth funds that invest internationally, paving the way for post-oil revenue streams. This starkly contrasts with the situation in Venezuela and Nigeria, both of which are on the hunt for billions in lost—as in nowhere to be found—profits.
On the other end of the spectrum, European producers—especially Norway and France, as well as the United States and Canada—enjoy diversified economies that subsidize fossil fuel, but do not play a direct role in its extraction or distribution. In this group of states, it is the private companies that weather the bulk of the losses in a market downturn.
Of course, these governments must still provide the unemployment benefits entitled to workers who are fired during a downturn, and budget specialists must maintain a plan to navigate lower tax revenues from domestic oil majors, but overall, their public sectors remain far more insulated from the volatilities of the oil sector than those nations with mammoth nationalized firms.
These are just the domestic implications of the end of the oil era. Foreign policies, especially of the world’s biggest superpowers, have long revolved around energy needs.
Balances of Power, Oil Friends and Foes
Control over oil has shaped major aspects of the United States’ relationship with Russia and the Arab World. The OPEC-led Arab Oil Embargo of 1973 - protesting the sale of arms to Israeli military forces by Western states - caused massive fuel shortages in the U.S., leading Congress to ban the export of domestically produced oil. The prohibition ended just last year, four decades later.
Still, the U.S. elects to import oil from the bloc’s de facto leader, Saudi Arabia, rather than turn to its eternal foe, Russia. Cold War anxieties from the 1980s - fresher in the minds of the American electorate than the Arab-Israeli wars of the 60s and 70s - steer leaders away from fuel trades with President Vladimir Putin.
Europe has been seeking new natural gas partners after Russia, which provides the continent with a quarter of its gas supplies, seized Crimea and supported the oppressive Syrian government.
Donald Trump’s selection as U.S. president-elect could change the country’s dynamic with Russia. Trump has famously praised Putin for his “leadership,” but it’s far too soon to measure the wildcard’s willingness to pursue stronger ties with Russia.
Can Natural Gas Save the Vulnerable?
For many nations, the next big environmental step after oil is natural gas. When we compare a list of countries with the largest proven oil reserves with the same list for natural gas deposits, a bunch of the same countries appear in the highest positions, albeit in a different order.
Venezuela boasts the largest oil reserves in the world, but it stands in eighth place on the natural gas list. Saudi Arabia, Russia, the United Arab Emirates, Iran and Nigeria take positions in the top 10 for both commodities as well.
ADVERTISEMENT
The overlap in major players in the oil and natural gas markets says there will certainly be some continuation as demand shifts from one commodity to another, even as Canada, Libya and Iraq will find themselves as losers longer-term, in the absence of a push for renewables (the trio is included in the oil top 10, but disappears in the natural gas list). Related: With Trump Elected, What’s Next For Oil?
Turkmenistan will see new prominence as natural gas gains popularity. As the only country not to appear on in the top 20 positions of the oil reserves list, but present at 4th place in the gas deposits list, the central Asian nation is due for more geopolitical love in the coming decades.
The former Soviet republic currently exports two-thirds of its gas to Russia’s Gazprom.
Turkmenistan’s reserves will add to Russia’s international political leverage as countries all over the world develop the infrastructure to support liquefied natural gas in their oil-based economies.
As the 103 countries that have ratified the United Nations-led change agreement meet at the COP22 conference in Marrakesh this week, the world inches closer to making a carbon-neutral world possible, but careful consideration of the geopolitical ramifications should also be made.
The domestically fragile oil producers - which more closely resemble an oil-soaked house of cards than stable nations - will need major economic attention as renewables and natural gas become the new energy standard.
By Zainab Calcuttawala for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
- Trump Considers Oil Tycoon Harold Hamm for Energy Dept.
- OPEC’s Bearish Report Provides Little Hope For Oil Markets
- Is GE Looking To Exit Oilfield Services?
Warmest regards
Oil is too great a substance for some other energy source to displace it until it begins to physically run out, with the price then going through the roof. Electric cars will NEVER be as convenient as gasoline powered ones. Gasoline and diesel are just too energy rich for batteries to naturally displace them. And mass production, and quality control have made fossil cars cheap and durable. It will be at least two decades before countries with a lot of liquid oil have to worry about the world not wanting it. Oil is just too good for that. They call it 'black gold' for a reason, and will for decades more.
The problem will come when the oil supply available starts to decline, forcing the world to shift to a more expensive, and less efficient energy source. That will be a dark day. When it arrives, the big problem will be preventing the banks from collapsing. They aren't designed to function in a shrinking economy. And barring some major scientific breakthrough, less oil will force the global economy to shrink.
As to you Jack, right now there is peak child which leads to peak population which leads to peak everything really.
I think the author is right-on on in stressing the geopolitical fragility of oil-producing nations. As big and as powerful and essential as oil is, over-reliance on oil's wonders often ends up as a kind of a curse -- especially if the sovereign oil fund was under-attended to in up-cycles so as to be ready for low market prices.
As for peak oil demand, the transition away from burning petroleum has begun. Slow, steady progress along the lines of 3 or 4% growth a year seems economically assured. Really, the main question is how quickly should we un-soak ourselves, beyond what is naturally in the cards already for transitioning away from burning up a great resource?
With all due respect to the author, before I refute her conclusion, I would like to point out there is an obvious grammatical error in above paragraph. Secondly, if renewables means solar and wind powers, they are not new source of energy but derive from fossil energy and traditional commodities - you need diesel power to dig out silicon under the ground to be manufactured by fossil powered factories to make solar panel. Without fossil fuel and base metal, there is no way you can make solar panel and wind turbine.
Forgive me to say, most conclusions in this article are purely childish views not based on facts and common sense.
You stated that "Electric cars will NEVER be as convenient as gasoline powered ones. Gasoline and diesel are just too energy rich for batteries to naturally displace them."
This is such a foolish thought I'm not sure its even worth trying to correct you. Electric cars can accelerate significantly faster than gasoline powered vehicles because electric motors delivery full torque at low RPM's. The energy density issue is basically done now that Telsa and GM have shown you can create vehicles that get well over 200 miles on a full charge. The barrier to wider adoption of electric vehicles has primarily been one of cost (too high). Since you obviously have not been paying attention to the cost curve of battery storage I'll give you an update...they are coming down fast and there is no end in sight to the trend.
Let's leave the full BEV aside for a moment. About 80% of Americans have a commute that is less than 20 miles. Add in a small cushion for misc. trips and most people drive well under 50 miles per day. A plug in hybrid with a relatively low cost battery will be able to charge at night using relatively inexpensive electricity and that will display a huge amount of demand for liquid fuels. We will still need oil and gas but all pricing is set at the margin and oil and gas are about to be in for a world of hurt when they lose pricing power. Consumers never really had a viable alternative to gasoline until recently and we are just at the very tip of the curve for the electrification of transportation. Everything is tied to the cost of batteries coming down quickly and that is unstoppable at this point in time.
I wonder, it is the lack of basic science teaching in our time of mass education, which results so many people to mistake political propaganda as genuine science. What this modern mass education creates is not men of knowledge but ignorant spoiled brats and street thugs.
Without cheap oil in the current anaemic global economy which still hasn’t managed to get out of the GFC of 2008, the global financial Ponzi scheme would implode starting with the US and swiftly moving on to Europe and eventually China. Low oil prices are needed to keep interest rates near 0 and the QE unlimited gravy train running 24/7 to prop up the big US/European banks. If oil prices are allowed to reach their real economical values, inflation will quickly follow and interest rates will have to rise and that will be the end of QE and free money for the big banks.
It’s somewhat insulting to see articles like this on sites such as oilprice, laced with opinion supported by few real facts. Peak oil supply will hit the world much before (watch the documentary Collapse featuring Michael Ruppert who provides real facts) peak oil demand given the way the likes of the Saudis are pumping. These fools fell for the disinfo that expensive and mass polluting fracking would somehow compete with conventional supplies and hiked their production providing a field day for the big US banks that shorted oil to absurd levels. But now it is coming to haunt them not just the likes of Venezuela.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves_in_Mexico
It can do anything they can do, and with far less pollution. It is a natural barrier to high oil prices, as advances in lower priced solar power continue. The artificial promotion of battery powered vehicles rather than natural gas will not work with large vehicles such as trucks, locomotives, ships etc. Natural gas is the answer to replacing dirty forms of energy and fueling small electric vehicles with electricity. It can also run hybrid electric vehicles.
then go outside and make tires out of tree bark and grass clippings.......good luck on that
Miles per year are about the same.
For the peak food argument, i dont eat anywhere near what i ate at 17, maybe you do?