On 17 September The Wall Street Journal published a fascinating article on âpeak oil,â âThere Will Be Oil,â written by Daniel Yergin, chairman of IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates, an energy research and consulting firm and deserved recipient of Pulitzer Prize for his 1991 book, The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power.
According to The Wall Street Journal, âThere Will Be Oilâ âis adapted from his new book, The Quest: Energy, Security and the Remaking of the Modern World.â
The essay will doubtless have widespread influence amongst prosperous The Wall Street Journal readers, but in his glib dismissal of âpeak oilâ theory advocates, Yergin glosses or ignores a number of issues fundamental to the larger picture, for whatever reason, and these oversights should be considered in any evaluation of the piece and the peak oil âspecter.â
Yergin notes, âJust in the years 2007 to 2009, for every barrel of oil produced in the world, 1.6 barrels of new reserves were added.â But this fails to take into account the following points.
First is that for oil producing nations reserves are like money in the bank and inflated reserve figures are common. Even with the newest technology oil reserve figures remain at best âguesstimatesâ and should not be taken as hard and fast figures.
Secondly, while the Middle East for the foreseeable future will remain the worldâs top producing area, it is unhappily also one of the most politically unstable regions of the world. The âArab Springâsâ impact is still playing out, much less potential impact of Palestineâs incipient bid at the United Nationâs for recognition, both of which could yet still throw a major spanner in the works.
To recap briefly:
Saudi Arabia, the worldâs first or second-largest producer, vying with the Russian Federation for top position, is not immune from either of the two aforementioned effects. Saudi Arabia does not allow foreign oil companies concessions and has adopted a strict conservation policy, so donât expect to see a massive rise in production there anytime soon. As for Palestineâs impact, last week former head of Saudi Arabian intelligence and ex-ambassador to Washington, Prince Turki al-Faisal in an essay in the New York Times warned that an American veto of Palestinian U.N. membership would end the ''special relationship'' between the two countries, and make the US ''toxic'' in the Arab world.
As for Iraq, eight years after the U.S.-led invasion, holder of massive amounts of untapped reserves, the country remains mired in a low-grade civil war and unresolved political issues between its oil-rich northern Kurdish region and Baghdad. Further east, Iran is most unlikely to boost production significantly anytime soon because of U.S. sanctions imposed in 1979.
Libya remains the wild card, with only 25 percent of the countryâs oil potential explored, but it has been wracked by six months of civil unrest, and the irredentist cadre of Gaddafi supporters could easily target the countryâs oil infrastructure in the future.
In the Western Hemisphere, OPEC recently announced that Venezuelaâs potential reserves could top those of Saudi Arabia, but the deteriorating relations between Caracas and Washington make an increase here unlikely anytime soon.
Many optimists pin their hopes on increased offshore production, from Brazil through Western Africa, the Mediterranean and the Caspian to the South China Sea but these regionsâ output will suffer from the twin curses of both greatly increased âlifting costsâ in the billions as well as political instability. West Africa is synonymous with corruption and civil war; Lebanon, the Republic of Cyprus, Israel and Turkey are sparring over eastern Mediterranean hydrocarbons; two decades after the collapse of the USSR Azerbaijan, Iran, Kazakhstan, the Russian Federation and Turkmenistan have yet to reach a definitive agreement on the division of the Caspianâs offshore waters and tension is rising markedly in the South China Sea, where China, the Philippines, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei are all pursuing contesting claims.
Of the aforementioned areas only Brazil has uncontested national sovereignty claims over its offshore deposits, and the government is sufficiently concerned about their security that it is considering building a nuclear submarine to patrol its offshore oil platforms. As for the rest, it is difficult to see how the nations involved will be able to attract large-scale investment into potential conflict zones.
Furthermore, quite aside from political wrangles, offshore drilling is both extremely expensive and comes with increased environmental risks.
Interestingly, the word âenvironmentâ appears only once in Yerginâs essay, in the sentence, âEnvironmental and climate policies can alter the timing and scale of development, as can geopolitics and politics within oil-producing countries.â
Given that the majority of the futureâs oil production increase will come from offshore developments, the term should have been given greater prominence.
BPâs Deepwater Horizon Macondo oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico began on 20 April and spewed crude for three months in 2010 and was the largest accidental marine oil spill in the history of the petroleum industry, dwarfing the 1979 Gulf of Mexico Ixtoc I oil spill. Since the Deepwater Horizon incident unleashed 4.9 million barrels of oil the Gulf of Mexico suffered another rig explosion and fire at the Vermilion Block 380 A Platform on 2 September 2010.
Across the Atlantic, on 12 August a British subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell announced a leak at a platform flow line in its Gannet field concession in the North Sea.
As for the BP leak, on 12 May 2010 California Democrat Representative Henry Waxman said that the House Oversight and Investigations subcommittee investigation into the Gulf oil spill revealed that the Deepwater Horizon Macaondo oil platformâs blowout preventer (BOP) did not pass a crucial pressure test just hours before the explosion.
Waxman said, "This catastrophe appears to have been caused by a calamitous series of equipment and operational failures. If the largest oil and oil services companies in the world had been more careful, 11 lives might have been saved and our coastlines protected."
The Deepwater Horizon Study Group of University of Californiaâs the Center for Catastrophic Risk concluded in its âFinal Report on the Investigation of the Macondo Well Blowout,â released 1 March 2011, âAt the time of the Macondo blowout, BPâs corporate culture remained one that was embedded in risk-taking and cost-cuttingâ¦â.
Tracking back the signs of incipient failure, on 28 February 2009 the Department of the Interior exempted BP's Deepwater Horizon drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact study after concluding that a massive oil spill was unlikely.
ADVERTISEMENT
Four months later, on 22 June 2009 BP engineers warned that the Deepwater Horizon BOPâs metal casing might collapse under high pressure. Seeking to spread the blame, in April 2011 BP sued Cameron International Corp., the maker of the failed Type TL 18¾in 15K double blowout preventer on the Macondo well, Deepwater Horizon drilling rig operator Transocean and Halliburton, the wellâs cement contractor, saying they were largely to blame for the accident.
There are 3,800 active oil platforms in the Gulf of Mexico â how long until another major spill?
So, where does all this leave the world? Older producing fields and nations, such as Indonesia and Saudi Arabiaâs massive Ghawar superfield have seen their production decline. Indonesia, which had begun producing oil in the early 20th century, saw its production slide so much that it left OPEC in 2008, seemingly confirming Marion King Hubbertâs âpeak oilâ theory.
While it is true that Hubbertâs predictions, made in the 1950s, took no account of future energy developments such as Africa, the Caspian and offshore, all of these regions and projects come with increased costs, which ultimately will undoubtedly be passed on to the consumers.
Is the world then running out of oil then? No, but the increase in future global oil production will likely be modestly incremental and production could be thrown off course by any number of possible events, from an Israeli attack on Iran to (another, but successful this time) al Qaida attack on Saudi Arabiaâs Abqaiq oil refinery.
Accordingly, it is inexpensive oil that is in terminal decline, a development viewed positively by Yergin, who writes, âActivity goes up when prices go up; activity goes down when prices go down. Higher prices stimulate innovation and encourage people to figure out ingenious new ways to increase supply.â
Many American motorists would disagree.
By. John C.K. Daly of OilPrice.com