Global central banks have made an 'all-in' effort to front-load monetary policy tightening to dampen demand. But softer economic data in the eurozone and United States have exacerbated recession fears.
As the growth outlook dims, many anticipate demand destruction to lead to lower inflation. That is, tighter monetary policy and the associated higher funding costs will cut into demand and offset the supply shortages resulting from geopolitical instability and supply-chain disruptions. This view hinges on the belief that inflation outcomes are largely driven by central bank policies.
However, what US Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell described in 2019 as 'muted' inflation in previous years, especially during the 2014 to 2016 oil-price crash, has demonstrated inflation's insensitivity to demand-side policies. Even the European Central Bank (ECB)'s quantitative easing (QE) in 2015 failed to stoke demand in a way that reduced excess supply.
The Fed's dovish policy stance in the decade before the pandemic pushed the Atlanta Fed's Wu-Xia Shadow Federal Funds Rate below zero multiple times. Yet the Fed's preferred price measure - personal consumption expenditures (PCE) - was less responsive to such policy shifts than to the end of the Cold War or China's entry into the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in 2001, among other catalysts.
Sources: Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, US Department of Commerce, Kekselias, Inc.
Similarly, recent quantitative tightening and rate hikes have not created enough demand destruction to counteract geopolitics-related commodity scarcity. Instead of following central bank policy over the past two decades, inflation largely co-moved with commodity prices, or both demand and supply-side factors.
Sources: Eurostat, UK Office for National Statistics, US Federal Reserve, Bloomberg, LP, Kekselias, Inc.
This casts doubts on the 'rates-determine-activities-determine-inflation' framework and suggests that domestic monetary policy cannot lift or dampen inflation on its own. Other factors must come into play.
Given QE's long and variable trickle-down effect, pandemic-era policies sought to counter the demand shortfall by expanding balance sheets and through fiscal stimulus, or printing money and mailing cheques directly to households. This drastically decreased the transmission time between central bank easing and realised inflation. The deployment of 'helicopter money' rapidly revived demand.
As pandemic disruptions eased, the anticipated fiscal tightening never materialised. Instead, fiscal-monetary cooperation became the norm and cash payments a regular policy tool. Following its Eat Out to Help Out Scheme, for example, the UK government in May this year announced a £15 billion package to send £1,200 support payments to millions of households. As UK energy prices spiked, Liz Truss, the UK prime minister, proposed an emergency fiscal spending package to ease the public's financial stress.
On the other side of the Atlantic, many US states have announced stimulus payments to soften the pain of high inflation, and president Joe Biden has introduced a student loan relief programme.
The lesson is clear: central banks are no longer the only game in town when it comes to economic stimulus.
As multinationals regionalise, near-shore and re-shore supply chains and prioritise resiliency and redundancy over cost-optimisation, energy scarcity in the eurozone has created new disruptions. German chemical production is set to fall in 2022, which could export inflation abroad.
As geopolitical instability contributes to domestic economic challenges and more fiscal stimulus is deployed, inflation may be much less responsive to traditional monetary drivers. Under such circumstances, a rigid framework equating tight monetary policy and high prices with demand destruction and disinflation will no longer be operable.
For investors calibrating portfolio risks, such conditions may offset the disinflationary pressures of slowing growth.
By CityAM
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
CityAM.com is the online presence of City A.M., London's first free daily business newspaper. Both platforms cover financial and business news as well as sport and… More
Comments
Central banks are using the usual monetary policies to tackle inflation by trying to curb demand for goods and offset global shortages. But this won’t work because the global economy is facing a unique type of recession.
In normal circumstances, monetary policies such as raising Central bank banks’ rates would lead to a shrinking of the global economy and a demand destruction resulting in reduced global demand for goods and a reduction in prices thus controlling inflation.
But we are facing abnormal circumstances and a unique type of recession against which monetary policies on its own won’t work and may even worsen inflation and economic conditions.
A case in point is crude oil. Monitory policies on their own will certainly lead to a shrinking of the global economy but with no demand destruction since there is no spare demand to destruct. The reasons are a tight global oil market, robust oil demand and a fast-shrinking spare production capacity.
To control inflation and this unique type of recession we have to start from the end meaning try to reduce energy prices. In so doing, we will be able to cut the costs of transport, food production, industrial production and shipping to name but a few.
This can be done by geopolitical and monitory policies combined. The geopolitical measures are: (1) ending the Ukraine conflict with the West agreeing to address Russia’s legitimate security concerns and (2) lifting the sanctions against Russia thus allowing the free flow of cheap Russian oil, gas and coal around the world.
Monetary policies could be used softly to ensure that liquidity is available when needed and inflation remains within low acceptable levels.
Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
International Oil Economist
Global Energy Expert
But he is off the mark with 'printing money'. The support spending converted private debt to public debt. That is how central banks work. They do not 'print money'.